Oklahoma looked great against Texas Tech. 65-21 is an absolute route and they should get all the credit in the world for being a great team. I am not trying to take anything away from Oklahoma and what they did Saturday, but how is it possible to be ranked in front of a team that beat you?
In the AP poll, Oklahoma is #3 while Texas is #4. This makes absolutely no sense. It gets even worse than that. Oklahoma is #2, while Texas is #4 in the coaches poll. The coaches poll is used in the BCS formula. (Look at poll results here)
I don't understand how someone can vote this way. Both Texas and Oklahoma play in the Big 12 South. They play the same teams. They each have one loss and were ranked very highly in the preseason. Oklahoma lost to Texas on a neutral site, I repeat, Oklahoma LOST to TEXAS on a NEUTRAL site.
Oklahoma has one thing going for them, and it shouldn't even be a "thing" that they have going for them. Oklahoma beat Texas Tech, Texas Tech beat Texas. Oklahoma beat Tech at home, Texas lost to Tech at Texas Tech on a fluky play in the final seconds. If that is justification for a voter for placing Oklahoma in front of Texas in the rankings, then their vote should be taken away from them.
If this isn't a call for a playoff system, then I don't know what is. A season like this just shows how screwing college football is. Now we are debating who has better non conference wins, and coaches are lobbying voters to get their teams into the National Title game. Things like that should not be happening. Deciding who the best team is should be decided on the field.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
New NFL Playoffs
I have a brand new way of deciding who will play in the Super Bowl. We will just take whoever we think the best two teams are, and have them play for the championship. This year it would be the Giants playing the Titans. We don’t need a playoff system because those two teams are obviously the best teams in the NFL.
In future years, say we have a team finish 14-2, but the next best record, say 12-4, is the same record for 3 teams. Well that solution is very simple as well. Whoever we thought was going to be better at the beginning of the year will get the nod because say if one the 12-4 teams is a team that came out of nowhere. Well their season was obviously a fluke, and the preseason favorite should play for the title. Now we have 2 teams at 12-4, how do we decide who plays for the title? If they don’t play head-to-head, we will vote on who had to play in the tougher conference. Hypothetically, we will apply this format to the current NFL season. Say the Titans is the team that finishes 14-2, and the other two teams at 12-4 are the Giants and the Cardinals. The Giants will play in the Super Bowl because the NFC East this year is much tougher than the NFC West. But don’t worry; we will put the Cards in a meaningless game against some other random team/division winner.
We could also use the aid of computers to help decide the better team. The computer calculates rankings based on a team’s schedule and who they beat, and the teams that were beaten by the teams the original team beat. Let’s say the 12-4 teams are Team A and Team B and a random team, Team C, is 8-8, and another random team, Team D, is 6-10. During the course of the season, Team A and Team B beat Team D. Team B also beats Team C, but Team A loses to Team C. Although Teams A and B have the same record, didn’t play against each other, and have similarly tough divisions, Team B gets to play in the Super Bowl because they beat a team that Team A lost to. That way, no human error is involved and we can get rid of a biased voting system. It’s that simple.
We will then have the division winners (8 teams) and 4 wildcard teams play each other in meaningless games just for the hell of it. So, the way that it will work out is that we will have 2 playing in the Super Bowl, and 10 other teams just playing for the hell of it, the “Just for the hell of it” games will be held on super bowl weekend. We can even get corporate sponsorship, such as Aflac or Applebee’s for the “Just for the hell of it” games.
There you have it, the perfect system for deciding the NFL champion. There isn’t a single flaw. I came up with that all on my own. Hopefully someday I can get the NCAA to follow such a format…
In future years, say we have a team finish 14-2, but the next best record, say 12-4, is the same record for 3 teams. Well that solution is very simple as well. Whoever we thought was going to be better at the beginning of the year will get the nod because say if one the 12-4 teams is a team that came out of nowhere. Well their season was obviously a fluke, and the preseason favorite should play for the title. Now we have 2 teams at 12-4, how do we decide who plays for the title? If they don’t play head-to-head, we will vote on who had to play in the tougher conference. Hypothetically, we will apply this format to the current NFL season. Say the Titans is the team that finishes 14-2, and the other two teams at 12-4 are the Giants and the Cardinals. The Giants will play in the Super Bowl because the NFC East this year is much tougher than the NFC West. But don’t worry; we will put the Cards in a meaningless game against some other random team/division winner.
We could also use the aid of computers to help decide the better team. The computer calculates rankings based on a team’s schedule and who they beat, and the teams that were beaten by the teams the original team beat. Let’s say the 12-4 teams are Team A and Team B and a random team, Team C, is 8-8, and another random team, Team D, is 6-10. During the course of the season, Team A and Team B beat Team D. Team B also beats Team C, but Team A loses to Team C. Although Teams A and B have the same record, didn’t play against each other, and have similarly tough divisions, Team B gets to play in the Super Bowl because they beat a team that Team A lost to. That way, no human error is involved and we can get rid of a biased voting system. It’s that simple.
We will then have the division winners (8 teams) and 4 wildcard teams play each other in meaningless games just for the hell of it. So, the way that it will work out is that we will have 2 playing in the Super Bowl, and 10 other teams just playing for the hell of it, the “Just for the hell of it” games will be held on super bowl weekend. We can even get corporate sponsorship, such as Aflac or Applebee’s for the “Just for the hell of it” games.
There you have it, the perfect system for deciding the NFL champion. There isn’t a single flaw. I came up with that all on my own. Hopefully someday I can get the NCAA to follow such a format…
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
IKEA!
I finally lost my V-card last night, and it's a night that I will always remember. It was 8:00pm, November 11th 2008. So many things that I have never seen before, it was easy to get lost perusing around everywhere. It was a special night since it was my loved ones first time as well. It didn't last as long as I wanted, but it's ok, I'll be coming back. After looking around, touching and playing with everything I finally arrived to the end. I found the coffee table that I was looking for, and went on my way. I'm sorry, did I forget to mention that I lost my IKEA V-card last night?
IKEA is absolutely amazing. I couldn't believe the size of the place. I felt like a little rat in maze. I kept looking for the security cameras that scientists used to study us in such a store as this. Classifying everyone that is in the store: First timers, seasoned shoppers, and remodelers.
The best of IKEA is the showroom. So many different idea's are presented on the showroom. European innovation and thinking out of the box is on display everywhere. A favorite Idea of mine was "Use less floor space, use useless wall space". This sign was next to a closet that was against a wall that arched over the bed.
It's a very dangerous place. I went there for just a 30 dollar coffee table, but I wanted to get a new drawer set, night stand, couch, entertainment stand, wine glasses, lamp, bed set and I actually left with candles. They have absolutely everything that you can think about there. They even have a cafe. It's also dangerous because of the prices. Everything has great value, which makes you want to buy more things. It's a vicious cycle.
I am now hooked on IKEA. I want to buy all my stuff there now. It is my new love, and I will be spending a lot of time there now in the future. I now know where to drop all of my scratch-it winnings on, IKEA!
Friday, November 7, 2008
From ROY to potential MVP
There is a checklist for becoming an NBA star, and Brandon Roy is close to completing the list. Make every correct play down the floor, check. Be a team leader, check. Be great at something (Vision, basketball savvy), and really, really, really good at everything else, check. Make others around you better, check. Be clutch in big time moments, check (The ink is still fresh on that check mark.) Become consistent every night... not quite yet, but getting there.
Brandon Roy is becoming an all star in the NBA, and is beginning to look like a potential MVP candidate every night. Roy is developing into what MVPs are supposed to do for their team's. MVPs make the biggest plays in the biggest moments, no matter the struggles that they have had during a game. The shot that Roy hit last night against the Rockets proves that point. He also kept making plays for the rest of his team the other night in Utah even though he wasn't playing well. He's doing what great pitchers do in baseball, even though he may not have his best stuff, he keeps his team in the game by doing other things.
Roy makes every correct play down the court. Making correct decisions makes others around him better by putting them in great situations. This is important since he has the ball in his hands every possession. He feeds Aldridge when he has a mismatch, he penetrates and kicks when Rudy is on the floor. You don't see Roy kicking to the Vanilla Gorilla Pryzbilla 20 feet from the basket, and you don't see him kicking out to Batum. Batum's strengths are around the basket, being a slasher, and Roy knows this. He knows the strengths and weaknesses of all his teammates.
The main goal now for Roy is consistency. Jason Quick of the Oregonian in a recent article after the Utah game stated that Roy needs to be better. This is true, but one thing that Portland fans, and writers need to realize is that Roy is still growing. Roy is now facing defenses who have geared up to stop him all summer. Other teams have heard how great the Blazers are going to be this year, and they want to stop the best player. Roy is very smart and doesn't get too high, or too low. Adjustments will be made, there is no need for snap judgments after 4 games of an 82 game season. The Blazers aren't going to compete this year for a title anyways, they will be competing this year and the year after. He needs to go through the growing pains, the same way that rookies QBs can be thrown into the fire. I think Peyton Manning, Troy Aikman, and John Elway turned out alright after going through growing pains. Basketball is no different, players need to learn how to play, compete, adjust, lead, and finish games at the highest level
If given proper time, and fans can understand that this year is still a rebuilding year for the Blazers, then Roy will be able to check the final box in his checklist of becoming an MVP candidate.
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Do the Blazer's Have a Big 3?
It’s common knowledge around the NBA. To win an NBA championship you need 3 all star caliber players. The Celtics did it last year with Garnett, Pierce, and Allen and the Spurs before them with Duncan, Ginobili, and Parker. The early 2000s Lakers were able to win championships with out a big 3, but they had 2 hall of fame players along with a hall of fame coach, same goes for the Bulls of the 90s, not to mention incredible supporting casts.
The Blazers know this all to well. They have one for sure in Brandon Roy. It’s very early on in the season, but he looks like a new Roy, and that’s saying something considering he was an all star last year. He now understands that the Blazers is his team. He is the go to guy in crunch time. He now knows that he’s a true leader on and off the court. He’s being more aggressive, taking advantage of mismatches, and makes the right play down the court just about every possession. Roy for sure is all star caliber player number one, and looking like potential MVP candidate in a few years as the talent around him improves.
The last 2 all star caliber players ( From now on All Star Caliber Players will be known as ASCP) for the Blazers are still unknown, especially since it’s beginning to look like Oden shook hands with Sam Bowie when he arrived in Portland. Aldridge is looking to be ASCP number 2. He’s developing a low post, back to the basket, gonna score because he’s freakishly tall with freakishly long arms with a freakishly high release point game. He bought a brand new bag of tricks over the summer. That bag is full of a stronger body, a quick hook shot, a fall away with a freakishly high release point, an up and under, and a power drop step. These are moves that Aldridge didn’t have last year, and he’s already put all of them on display in the first couple of game for the Blazers. He’s even learning how to stay out of foul trouble, stay on the floor, and contribute on defense. Last year all he did was pick and pop with Roy, or hang out of the weak side, or use his face up game from 20 feet. I always had confidence that Aldridge would be a great player, just not great on the post. I was scared he was just a reincarnated ‘Sheed Wallace with a full brain, but unlike ‘Sheed, Aldridge has a desire to be the best at his position. Every aspect of his game has improved. If he keeps improving, he will have a low post game, and face up game, and range to the 3 point line, how can that be stopped? If he can start commanding a double team on the block on a consistent basis, that can open up the door for potential ASCP number 3.
There is something about Rudy Fernandez that makes him special. He isn’t scared. He has absolutely no fear and he walks the fine line of being confident, but not a cocky, arrogant, asshole. Perhaps it’s because he’s not used to American culture, or he just isn’t a big star yet. I say yet with all the confidence that he will become a great player, while hoping that he stays grounded and fits in the with team unity thing that McMillen and Pritchard has built up. He’s already a part of the crunch time line up with Roy in the back court, Outlaw (Soon to be Webster), Aldridge, and the Vanilla Gorilla Pryzbilla/ Bowie 2.0. In the Olympic championship game Rudy displayed no fear. He took every big shot for Spain. Rudy was almost unguardable. He is constantly moving, looking for the big play, and looking to make the impossible play. Rudy thrives on making that “Oh my god he just jumped over every one, avoided the rim, grabbed the bad alley-oop pass, he’s 6’5’’ but gets as high as a 6’9’’ guy, trot down the floor and play D like it was nothing” plays. He’s a heady player who can take over games when the rest of the team is struggling. He just needs to learn when to take over games, and learn what makes a good shot good, and a bad shot bad. He also needs to learn how to play D, he can’t guard the chair that I’m sitting in. Fortunately McMillen is a great teacher, and preacher of D. There is a reason why he was an Olympic assistant coach.
The Blazers have 3 dark horses for being ASCPs if the obvious 3 don’t make it. The first is Oden. Maybe he will kick the bad luck bug and stay healthy, and form into the defensive force that he has the tools for. With all the scorers that the Blazers have, on the perimeter as well as a developing Aldridge, Oden can block shots and grab boards, get the clean up points around the rim and become an ASCP. Another dark horse is Martell Webster. I used to be down on him. The more I watch the more I begin to like. He’s big for his position, tall as well as strong. He can guard 3, potentially 4 spots of defense with his size and quickness. He has an absolute gorgeous jump shot. He can become an ASCP a la his jumper like Micheal Redd in Milwaukee. The darkest, pitch black of all the dark horses is Jerrod Bayless. He’s a shoot first point guard who has to learn how to become a distributor with all of the established and talented scorers that the Blazers already have. He will be waiting in the wing if the Blazers have injury problems. He is also a great trade bait that Portland can use to get the kind of point guard that they need.
The best part of the Blazers 3 ASCPs, as well as the dark horses, is that they are all really young. All of them are 25 or younger, Roy being the g’pa at 25. They have a few years to develop, and then dominate. The supporting cast is coming together, and they are just a few pieces away from contending for a title right now. If the city of Portland can be patient, and not pressure the young team, they can experience a potentially great stretch of basketball.
The Blazers know this all to well. They have one for sure in Brandon Roy. It’s very early on in the season, but he looks like a new Roy, and that’s saying something considering he was an all star last year. He now understands that the Blazers is his team. He is the go to guy in crunch time. He now knows that he’s a true leader on and off the court. He’s being more aggressive, taking advantage of mismatches, and makes the right play down the court just about every possession. Roy for sure is all star caliber player number one, and looking like potential MVP candidate in a few years as the talent around him improves.
The last 2 all star caliber players ( From now on All Star Caliber Players will be known as ASCP) for the Blazers are still unknown, especially since it’s beginning to look like Oden shook hands with Sam Bowie when he arrived in Portland. Aldridge is looking to be ASCP number 2. He’s developing a low post, back to the basket, gonna score because he’s freakishly tall with freakishly long arms with a freakishly high release point game. He bought a brand new bag of tricks over the summer. That bag is full of a stronger body, a quick hook shot, a fall away with a freakishly high release point, an up and under, and a power drop step. These are moves that Aldridge didn’t have last year, and he’s already put all of them on display in the first couple of game for the Blazers. He’s even learning how to stay out of foul trouble, stay on the floor, and contribute on defense. Last year all he did was pick and pop with Roy, or hang out of the weak side, or use his face up game from 20 feet. I always had confidence that Aldridge would be a great player, just not great on the post. I was scared he was just a reincarnated ‘Sheed Wallace with a full brain, but unlike ‘Sheed, Aldridge has a desire to be the best at his position. Every aspect of his game has improved. If he keeps improving, he will have a low post game, and face up game, and range to the 3 point line, how can that be stopped? If he can start commanding a double team on the block on a consistent basis, that can open up the door for potential ASCP number 3.
There is something about Rudy Fernandez that makes him special. He isn’t scared. He has absolutely no fear and he walks the fine line of being confident, but not a cocky, arrogant, asshole. Perhaps it’s because he’s not used to American culture, or he just isn’t a big star yet. I say yet with all the confidence that he will become a great player, while hoping that he stays grounded and fits in the with team unity thing that McMillen and Pritchard has built up. He’s already a part of the crunch time line up with Roy in the back court, Outlaw (Soon to be Webster), Aldridge, and the Vanilla Gorilla Pryzbilla/ Bowie 2.0. In the Olympic championship game Rudy displayed no fear. He took every big shot for Spain. Rudy was almost unguardable. He is constantly moving, looking for the big play, and looking to make the impossible play. Rudy thrives on making that “Oh my god he just jumped over every one, avoided the rim, grabbed the bad alley-oop pass, he’s 6’5’’ but gets as high as a 6’9’’ guy, trot down the floor and play D like it was nothing” plays. He’s a heady player who can take over games when the rest of the team is struggling. He just needs to learn when to take over games, and learn what makes a good shot good, and a bad shot bad. He also needs to learn how to play D, he can’t guard the chair that I’m sitting in. Fortunately McMillen is a great teacher, and preacher of D. There is a reason why he was an Olympic assistant coach.
The Blazers have 3 dark horses for being ASCPs if the obvious 3 don’t make it. The first is Oden. Maybe he will kick the bad luck bug and stay healthy, and form into the defensive force that he has the tools for. With all the scorers that the Blazers have, on the perimeter as well as a developing Aldridge, Oden can block shots and grab boards, get the clean up points around the rim and become an ASCP. Another dark horse is Martell Webster. I used to be down on him. The more I watch the more I begin to like. He’s big for his position, tall as well as strong. He can guard 3, potentially 4 spots of defense with his size and quickness. He has an absolute gorgeous jump shot. He can become an ASCP a la his jumper like Micheal Redd in Milwaukee. The darkest, pitch black of all the dark horses is Jerrod Bayless. He’s a shoot first point guard who has to learn how to become a distributor with all of the established and talented scorers that the Blazers already have. He will be waiting in the wing if the Blazers have injury problems. He is also a great trade bait that Portland can use to get the kind of point guard that they need.
The best part of the Blazers 3 ASCPs, as well as the dark horses, is that they are all really young. All of them are 25 or younger, Roy being the g’pa at 25. They have a few years to develop, and then dominate. The supporting cast is coming together, and they are just a few pieces away from contending for a title right now. If the city of Portland can be patient, and not pressure the young team, they can experience a potentially great stretch of basketball.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Watching football is forever changed
By now everyone has heard of the craze that is fantasy football. Fantasy football is for crazy sport nuts who dream of running their own team. It's a very simple system. Every NFL player gets put into a pool, then each member/team of the league selects a player to put on their own team. You end up being able to have several different players from different NFL teams.
The way your team scores points is by converting the real stats that your players compile every Sunday, and turning them into fantasy points. Say you have a running back who runs for 76 yards and 2 touchdowns, then he scored 15 points for you. 6 points for each touchdown, and 1 point for every 20 rushing yard. .
Here is why fantasy football has ruined the way I watch my favorite team. I have a really good shot of winning my league this year, and I don't have a single Seahawk on my roster. My biggest competitor has Julius Jones, the Seahawks running back. I've gone from watching the Seahawks, hoping they win any way possible, to hoping they win without Jones having a big day. I also have Larry Fitzgerald, a great wide receiver who puts up huge numbers. Unfortunately he plays the Seahawks twice a year since he's a divisional opponent. When the Hawks play the Cardinals, Fitzgerald's team, I have to wish for a 48-45 thriller in which the Seahawks win, and Fitzgerald catches 2 touchdowns for a 100 yards.
I shouldn't be hoping that the opposing team plays well. In fact I should be hoping for a 48-0 drumming, but things have changed since fantasy football has arrived. The Seahawks used to be the most important team to me, but now my fantasy team is the most important team to me. I actually have money and time invested into this team. I put more thought into my fantasy team, my reputation is on the line.
There are some good things about fantasy football. I have never followed the league so closely as I have now. Obscure, unknown, and unproven players with huge upside are now the biggest part of conversations among my friend and me. I now follow every game around the league, and I can tell you which teams are actually good, and which teams just hope to be good. You learn what young talent is on the rise and which all-pros seem to be losing their edge. You even learn to look beyond the stats. Lots of stats are products of the system that the players play in. This is often why statistically monsters in college never seem to pan out in the pros. Statistical monsters for one team, may not work for another team. Examples of this is every running back for Denver since Terrel Davis. Mike Shanahan has the system in place to have runners go for big numbers for cheap money. Those players then think they deserve a lot of money, some other team foolishly picks them up, and the player is never heard of again i.e. Ruben Droughns, Olandis Gary, and Tatum Bell. These guys will end being drafted in a fantasy league, and the person who drafted them has to deal with the trash talk that follows a lousy pick.
Another problem is that you begin to think good fantasy players will pan out to good real life players. An example was the old Kurt Warner. He has great fantasy numbers. He throws for lots of touchdowns and yards. The problem however is that can't take care of the football. He throws too many interceptions, and fumbles the ball too often. Turnovers in a real NFL game hurt a lot more than turnovers for fantasy reasons. In fantasy, a turnover from your QB doesn't give your fantasy opponents opportunities to score, but in real life they do.
Although fantasy football has changed the way that I watch football, I will participate until I die. I am willing to sacrifice how I root for games. I still want my Seahawks to win first and foremost, but now I can appreciate a little bit more when their opponents do well. Watching Fitzgerald score a touchdown in the 4th quarter with the Hawks up 14 wont be as painful anymore.
The way your team scores points is by converting the real stats that your players compile every Sunday, and turning them into fantasy points. Say you have a running back who runs for 76 yards and 2 touchdowns, then he scored 15 points for you. 6 points for each touchdown, and 1 point for every 20 rushing yard. .
Here is why fantasy football has ruined the way I watch my favorite team. I have a really good shot of winning my league this year, and I don't have a single Seahawk on my roster. My biggest competitor has Julius Jones, the Seahawks running back. I've gone from watching the Seahawks, hoping they win any way possible, to hoping they win without Jones having a big day. I also have Larry Fitzgerald, a great wide receiver who puts up huge numbers. Unfortunately he plays the Seahawks twice a year since he's a divisional opponent. When the Hawks play the Cardinals, Fitzgerald's team, I have to wish for a 48-45 thriller in which the Seahawks win, and Fitzgerald catches 2 touchdowns for a 100 yards.
I shouldn't be hoping that the opposing team plays well. In fact I should be hoping for a 48-0 drumming, but things have changed since fantasy football has arrived. The Seahawks used to be the most important team to me, but now my fantasy team is the most important team to me. I actually have money and time invested into this team. I put more thought into my fantasy team, my reputation is on the line.
There are some good things about fantasy football. I have never followed the league so closely as I have now. Obscure, unknown, and unproven players with huge upside are now the biggest part of conversations among my friend and me. I now follow every game around the league, and I can tell you which teams are actually good, and which teams just hope to be good. You learn what young talent is on the rise and which all-pros seem to be losing their edge. You even learn to look beyond the stats. Lots of stats are products of the system that the players play in. This is often why statistically monsters in college never seem to pan out in the pros. Statistical monsters for one team, may not work for another team. Examples of this is every running back for Denver since Terrel Davis. Mike Shanahan has the system in place to have runners go for big numbers for cheap money. Those players then think they deserve a lot of money, some other team foolishly picks them up, and the player is never heard of again i.e. Ruben Droughns, Olandis Gary, and Tatum Bell. These guys will end being drafted in a fantasy league, and the person who drafted them has to deal with the trash talk that follows a lousy pick.
Another problem is that you begin to think good fantasy players will pan out to good real life players. An example was the old Kurt Warner. He has great fantasy numbers. He throws for lots of touchdowns and yards. The problem however is that can't take care of the football. He throws too many interceptions, and fumbles the ball too often. Turnovers in a real NFL game hurt a lot more than turnovers for fantasy reasons. In fantasy, a turnover from your QB doesn't give your fantasy opponents opportunities to score, but in real life they do.
Although fantasy football has changed the way that I watch football, I will participate until I die. I am willing to sacrifice how I root for games. I still want my Seahawks to win first and foremost, but now I can appreciate a little bit more when their opponents do well. Watching Fitzgerald score a touchdown in the 4th quarter with the Hawks up 14 wont be as painful anymore.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
100?
Is 100 points in a game possible? It’s happened once in NBA history with Wilt Chamberlain. But the situation for him was much different than it is for players today. He was so much taller and longer than the rest of the players, that all he did was have to catch the ball on the post, do a jump spin thing, and finger roll the ball into the basket. He was the team’s only scoring option. Not only was he taller and longer than the rest of the players in the NBA at the time, but he was also way more athletic than the rest of them. The competition that he faced was at a much lower level, the game wasn’t completely figured out yet. Defense was an afterthought, and there was no such thing as a bad shot. I’m not trying to take away what Wilt did, it was an amazing feat, but every variable was perfect for him to score the 100 points.
Some current players automatically come to mind, the first being LeBron. He has the size, athleticism, skill, determination, swagger, and the “I can’t be stopped attitude” that is needed for a player to drop 100 in a game. My favorite analogy of Bron Bron is that he’s like a 2 pitch pitcher. He has a fastball (Outside shot), and a slider (penetrating to the basket). He has an ERA under 1.00 with his 2 pitches, and goes at least 8 innings every start. If he were to develop a change up (Mid range game) and a curve ball (Power post up game), he will literally become unstoppable. With his size, a two dribble, stop and pull up will be unstoppable. And if defenses decide to put a small, quick guard to stop penetration, he will be able to bull them over on the block. LeBron is the only, and I mean only option for that Cavs team to score. No one else on that team can create scoring for themselves. A problem with LeBron is that he’s too unselfish and prides himself on making the right basketball play every time down the court. Bron only becomes a selfish player in the Playoffs, but teams are too good to allow 60 points, let alone 100.
Another player is
A player that yet isn’t in his prime, but could hit 100 in a game sometime in his career is Kevin Durant. Right now he’s too young, way too skinny, and doesn’t shoot a high percentage. He has plenty of time to change all of that. For his age, his offensive game is amazing. He can create his own shot facing up, as well as posting him. He has range to the 3 point line, and can get to the rim. Once he’s able to get to the rim on a consistent basis, take the contact with a bigger frame, and finish the play for a 3 point play, he will battle LeBron for the best offensive player in the game. He’s a good offensive rebounder, and has the length to shoot over defenders.
Although he has long since retired, Micheal Jordan could have probably achieved 100 if the NBA was a little different while he was in his prime. One thing that many people forget is that when
Scoring 100 in a game is such an impossible feat it will probably never happen again. A perfect storm is needed for such a thing to happen. I’m not ruling out such a task from ever happening, it’s just highly unlikely. It just goes to show how head and shoulders above everyone else Wilt was when he played. Too bad there isn’t any video of that game ever happening.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)